Friday, February 4, 2011

Super Bowl XLV Sex

This morning our part of the world was covered by several inches of beautiful white snow.
That was an interesting backdrop to the news that I read about the upcoming Super Bowl XLV.  I learned via Fox News and other sources that Super Bowl XLV is anticipated to be a huge target for Human [Sex] Trafficking activity.  That is to say that that there are people out there enslaving children and selling their bodies for profit.  According to Traffic911, the average life expectancy for a child forced into sexual slavery is 7 years.

If you know anyone going to the Super Bowl, please encourage them to participate in the "I'm Not Buying It!" Tail Gate party, Saturday, February 5th.  At this event, you will learn how to help put a stop to the buying and selling of American children.

If the stories about the Super Bowl Human Trafficking weren't bad enough, the Planned Parenthood organization makes it even worse by endorsing sex ring activity.  The following two videos tell the whole story.





If you are planning to enjoy the Super Bowl either from home or in person, please pray for our and take action to protect our nation's children.  If you see children at risk that are exhibiting any of the following Red Flags, call 911 and the National Human Trafficking Hotline, 1.888.373.7888, if you suspect something. It’s better to be wrong than not to report it. A life might just depend on it.

  • Scripted answers. 
  • Inconsistencies in story. 
  • Branding or tattoos, especially that reflect ownership or money.
  • Bruising, including handprints or thin marks like an extension cord or wire. Varied stages of healing with black, purple, blue, yellow shades.
  • Coming on to several men.
  • Appears helpless, shamed, nervous.
  • Malnourished.
  • Inability or fear to make eye contact.
  • Chronic runaway; homeless youth.
  • Dating much older, abusive or controlling man.
  • Not attending school or has numerous school absences.
  • Clothes that say, “Daddy’s girl” or inappropriate for weather.

See the Traffick911.com web site to learn more.

Blessings to you and yours!

Brad

Monday, November 15, 2010

Is NTTA Scam Is Paying Off?

In a previous blog post titled "NTTA Put to the Test..." I asserted that despite a relatively constant  toll road transaction volume that the revenue would remain at the nearly doubled level or worse yet increase compared to previous years.  My hypothesis was that the increased revenue is derived primarily by increasing toll violations through prolonging the automated toll collection process.

The NTTA has provided a new report for investors (http://www.ntta.org/AboutUs/Investor+Information) that shows an estimation of the 2010 transaction and revenue volumes.  Lets look at the numbers presented in this report.

It does appear that the overall transaction volume has increased slightly since the end of 2009. However, the transaction level throughout 2010 seems relatively constant.

Now lets look at the revenue side of the equation.  Unfortunately for toll road users, the story appears to be the same.  The revenue is roughly double what it was before the NTTA implemented its new automated Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) booths and correspondingly the potentially fraudulent invoice and collections program (a.k.a. Scam).
It will be interesting to read the final report to see if the numbers are consistent with these projections.

Before closing, the following stories seem to substantiate that the NTTA's scam carries on through 2010.

Woman Slams NTTA for Arrest Warrant over Tolls
* Unpaid Tollway Authority bills can land you in jail
* The NTTA machine and me
* Tolls to Warrants
* NTTA Complaints - Zip cash

Brad

QuiBids: A LottoAuction Gambling Frenzy!

Perhaps you have seen banner ADs from QuiBids showing the absolutely amazing deals like those found in the advertisement to the right.

Wow!  67% to 90% off Apple products.  If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

I decided to dive into this "Penny Auction" service to learn more about how it works.  My summation of the whole experience is that it is a frenzy driven LottoAuction with a gambling twist.  In addition there appears to be clear deception in QuiBids advertising and representation of product value as well.

Lets look at a real auction that I watched over the weekend to see what we can learn.  Click on the Apple iPads 16GB Wi-Fi auction below to see the full view of this screen capture.

There are several note worthy items to glean from this screen capture and what the data implies.
The advertised value of the 16GB Wi-Fi iPad listed in this auction is $699.  However, Apple lists the advertised price as of the 16GB Wi-Fi iPad for just $499.  This is blatant fraud or misrepresentation at best.
The caption below the picture of the iPad says that this item was "Recently sold for $0.94".  I went back through the history of iPad's sold and the lowest auction close price that I found from the data that was available online was $47.83.  $47.83 is quite a bit off from $.94.  Again, fraud or just misrepresenting what is "Recent".  See spreadsheet below that lists all if the iPad auctions available through QuiBit's search feature.

Note from the spreadsheet as well that the amount that you pay for the auctioned item is the Auction Closing price PLUS your bid amount.  For example, the very best deal from this spreadsheet was where the Auction Closed for $48.83.  However, the winner had to pay that price, plus the sum of his bids which was $25.80  Add into that the $15.99 shipping and the grand total cost to the winner is $89.62.  That is certainly a great deal for an iPad.

If you didn't win the auction, you can use the "Buy it Now" feature which gives you the opportunity to preserve your bid investment by paying the difference between what you bid and the retail price of the iPad.  In this case, you would pay something less than $699 which is $200 more than the actual retail value of the product as listed by the manufacture.  Also, you have to buy bids up front at a cost of $0.60 per bid to participate in the auctions.

If you bid on the product but elected not to buy the product now, you forfeit all bids invested into the auction.  If no one used the "Buy it Now" option for the data that I collected, then the average amount forfeited by bidders per auction for the data that I collected was approximately $5,918.28.  That is a pretty good profit margin for selling a $499 iPad.

This begs the question, what is the "break-even" Auction Close amount required to meet the cost of the $699 iPad?  The answer is simple.  Take the cost of the item and divide it by the bid price divided by 100.  This gives a rough break-even Auction Close amount of $699/$0.60/100 =~ $12.

While researching this topic, I saw several suspicions of QuiBit using bots to artificially stimulate the bidding process in order to drive up the bidding.  While watching a a few bids, I could neither confirm or deny this.  One thing was clear though, there is often a frenzy of bids near the end of the auction.

One last item to be warned about is that none of the iPads that I saw could be returned if there was any issues.  It is up to you to verify that the iPad functions properly before the shipper leaves your home.

The key takeaway from this article is that while you may be able to get a good buy through QuiBids, it is also very possible that you could loose a lot of money in the process of getting that great deal.   So, bidder beware.

If you would like to learn more about penny auctions, check out http://www.pennyauctionwatch.com.

Brad

Saturday, July 24, 2010

NTTA News Flash: I got a timely bill!


CONGRATULATIONS NTTA!  


This is just a quick note to congratulate the NTTA for sending me a bill within two months of actual usage of the toll road system.

I only have one other vehicle with an outstanding bill from months ago.  In fairness to the NTTA, I suspect it may take longer simply because the vehicle still had dealer tags when I used the toll roads.

The last outstanding item for the NTTA that I can't wait to see is the 2010 NTTA Summary Annual Report.  You may recall from my previous blog post (NTTA Put To The Test...) where I hypothesized that the 2010 revenue may nearly double compared to previous years due to outrageous fees and poor invoice processing.  My last two blog posts give me hope that the NTTA may be cleaning up their invoice processing act.  If this blog post series (1-scam, 2-test, 3-update, 4-News Flash #1had anything to do with the improvements, kudos to social media and public accountability!

That's it for this update.  Have a great day!


Brad

Saturday, July 10, 2010

NTTA News Flash: I got a bill!

To my astonishment, I received my first bill from the NTTA yesterday.  Below you see a redacted version of the bill.  The most interesting thing to note from this bill is that it is for uses of the toll roads from late 2009 (e.g 6 months ago) and early 2010 (e.g. 3 months ago).  The early 2010 trip is one of the two trips that I have been tracking on my NTTA blog post series (1-scam, 2-test and 3-update).   Congratulations NTTA!  The bill isn't exactly timely but at least they kept their promise to send a bill.  Well done!  I hope that my remaining uses of the toll roads for my other two vehicles show up soon as well.


NTTA, I just paid my bill.  No need to send the collectors. ;-)

Have a great day!

Brad

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

NTTA Update...

Last weekend I really enjoyed shaving off nearly an hour of travel time by using the George Bush Turnpike (GBT) on my road trip.  When I got home, I realized that I was over due in providing my readers an update of my tests of the NTTA billing system.  The net of the tests was that I used the GBT and Dallas North Tollway (DNT) back in April of 2010 and on May 21st, 2010.  As of today, June 30, 2010 I have not received ANY bills for either of those uses of the NTTA toll roads.  

According to my experience with the NTTA billing process, the NTTA was supposed to promptly send me an invoice after I used the toll roads.  Then if my invoice was still unpaid after 30 days, they would send me a second invoice.   If I didn't pay either of those first two invoices within 60 days, they would add a $25 fine per invoice and turn my overdue unpaid invoices to a collection agency.  Last week marked the 30 day mark for may May 21st trip and I believe 60 days for my April trip.  Lets see how quickly that I get a letter from the collection agency.

I can't wait to send the collection agent to this series of blog posts. e.g. 3/7/20105/23/2010, and 6/30/2010.  However, if this billing cycle is anything like my previous experience, I may not hear from a collection agent until some time in 2012.

Have a blessed day!

Brad

Sunday, May 23, 2010

NTTA Put to the Test...

This last Friday (May 21st, 2010) I had to make a trip across the DFW metroplex.  I drove on the George Bush Turnpike (GBT) to see how long that it would take before the North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) sent me the first bill for my use of the GBT as well as to see how many bills that I would receive because I passed though several automated Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) booths.  This test is for a car that I know they have in their system.  Theoretically, I should get a bill within a month or so.  We will see.

Last month I took a new vehicle on the GBT taking the same path as last week's journey.  Because that was a new vehicle, I don't expect to receive a bill for at least a few years.  That way the NTTA can charge me huge late fees and administrative fees in the process.

In my previous blog post regarding the NTTA , I suggested that with the way they handle (or perhaps better stated don't handle) sending out bills and reminders in a timely manner. In my case from my previous blog post, it took over two years before they finally sent me my first bill via a collection agency. When I received the bill, I was charged $175 for $7.34 worth of toll charges. I suggested in that blog post that if the NTTA only treated 20% of the 500,000 (source: CBS estimate) daily users of the NTTA toll system that they could earn approximately $2.3 million per day yielding a total annual income from excessive fees of over $800 million.

This made wonder how much that the NTTA actually earned last year. So scanned through their 2009 NTTA Summary Annual Report. I was shocked by the overview of their financials and the accounting of the use of the tollway at the end of the report.  For reference, here is a screen capture of that information.

The NTTA reported that they only had 456,700,028 transactions for all of 2009. I presume that a transaction is each individual toll that a driver passes through.  If this is the case, then in 2009 the NTTA earned approximately $.73 per transaction.  The NTTA used to charge around $.75/transaction on the Dallas North Toll Road.  So, the total number is relatively in alignment with what they should have made with a small amount of loss.  However, in 2009 they did raise toll rates.  The NTTA clearly didn't break even on their toll/transaction rate for 2009.

I wonder how much of the revenue was generated by late fees and administrative fees versus timely paying Toll Tag and non-Toll Tag customers.

If the NTTA wants to offer true financial accountability in order to make their case of being robbed by non-paying users of the toll roads, they should include in their annual report a full breakdown of transactional types (e.g. Toll Tag, non-Toll Tag, paying, non-paying, and the tolls, fees and late payments recouped by those transactions. This is the only way to truly make their case in a convincing way.

As a side note, there were several noteworthy quotes from the 2009 NTTA Annual Summary Report that I found quite interesting.  Here is the first quote.


After six months of all-ETC operation in 2009, traffic was meeting revised projections. Revenue continued to increase as more ZipCash invoices were sent and paid for travel on the PGBT.  In fact, revenues exceeded projections.

Lets look at the those actuals.  First, here are the number of transactions for 2009.
The number of transactions per month has some minor fluctuation but largely similar.  Roughly 35 million transactions per month.  Now lets look at the revenues for 2009.
I find it interesting that although the number of monthly transactions didn't change that much throughout the year but in the months of September and November the revenue was almost double the preceding months.  I wonder if that is when the NTTA started collecting late fees and administrative fees on "non-paying" customers like me who never received a bill until I was sent a collections notice.  That would certainly explain why the NTTA "revenues exceeded projections".

On to the next savory quote.  This one focuses on their great customer support.  Before you read this quote note that when I called in, I waited over 30 minutes before anyone picked up the phone.
In 2009, the Roadway Customer Service team handled 17,985 incidents, representing an average of 346 per week, with an average response time of less than 12 minutes.
I'm not sure if the NTTA is aware of this or not but an average response time (e.g. the amount of time you wait on hold for someone to answer the phone) of nearly 12 minutes is INSANELY too long to promote a happy customer.  If the NTTA only works a 40 hour week, that means that they took less than 9 calls per hour.  The NTTA either has really long calls per agent or have a very lax requirement to pick up the phone in a timely manner.

Note also from the same report that in 2009 the NTTA had to reorganize 170 employees and let 19 go.  Not sure if the 19 were from customer service or not but that might have contributed to the long hold times.

Here is the next quote.  Not so savory.
Fine-tuning our ZipCash invoices As with any ambitious new program, our ZipCash launch required some fine-tuning. Some ZipCash customers, having never received an invoice from the NTTA before, were initially confused about the process for billing and payment. We gave our invoices and notices a user-friendly makeover to help customers distinguish each step in the payment and collections process.  To minimize confusion about paying ZipCash tolls, each phase of the new three-step invoice process—ZipCash, ZipCash Late Notice and Violation Invoice— has a distinct look. We hope to encourage motorists to pay for the use of the toll road before any late or administrative fees are applied to the transactions. We want the customers’ payment process to flow as smoothly as their driving experience.
Glad they made the invoices pretty and all but if they don't send them, it doesn't really matter how pretty they are.  But there is a bonus for NTTA with this strategy.... a lot more late fees and administrative fees to collect.

Here was a quote that would be interesting to know the rest of the story.


The story behind administrative fees It is important to the NTTA that we conduct all of our business in ways that are fair, clear and easily understood.  One way we do that is by working to see that the 92 percent of motorists who pay their tolls are not subsidizing nonpaying motorists’ trips on toll roads.
The NTTA takes a hard-line stance on habitual violators. Our collection process includes an administrative fee, authorized by statute, to help pay for the cost of collection. This is not a stream of additional income but rather a way of recouping some of the costs associated with enforcement.
However, the NTTA realizes that mistakes happen, confusion occurs or invoices are overlooked. For that reason, we waive 67 percent of administrative fees incurred if any violator takes care of the balance before the outstanding invoice is transferred to a collection agency. We want to do all we can to help customers avoid any additional fees.

With respect to the 92% rule, that sounds like the NTTA is saying that 12% is the number of nonpaying motorists.  I wonder if the 67% of waived fees were for the customers like me that called in and demanded that the erroneous fees be dropped... and the NTTA customer service representatives begrudgingly agreed.

The next humorous thing I found in the report is that the NTTA setup a Facebook (FB) page to become more social.  So, I went to FB and searched on NTTA.  Unfortunately I didn't find the official NTTA page.  However, what did show up was quite interesting... NTTA Fines Suck! FB page.  This was a vibrant community of 90 NTTA anti-friends that were all to vocal of their disapproval of abusive NTTA fines.  I had to resort to Google to find the official NTTA FB page.

I can't wait to see the 2010 NTTA Annual Summary Report.  I wonder if the overall revenue will nearly double like it did in the months of September and November of 2009.

I hope you enjoyed this exploration into the the realm of the NTTA and found my commentary interesting.  If I have misrepresented anything or got some fact wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me.   When correcting though, please site all references for everyone's benefit.

That is it for tonight.  Have a great day!

Brad